애국적 열망과 숭고한 과학: 진실추구를 저지한 저널리즘

The Process of Rupture(Cont)

Rupture

successful

(○)

Groups of young scientists could explain possible damage in case of fraud, detailed and comprehensible. Especially in national level as well, which could successfully counter national interestism

(○)

Flood of proof: Photo multiplication, DNA marker falsification, additional photo problems, broken alibi of research schedule.

(anonymous young scientists in Internet)

(○)

Fraud of cell numbers

Emerging counter discourse

Failed, but evoked debates among small specialists:

Latency of rupture.

(△)

-PD Diary could not allocate resources to build discourse on damage assessment

-The general public is mostly ignorant of scientific rules and possible outcomes in case of violation (×)

Two proofs presented before the broadcast, but countered powerless:

①Interview

②DNA test results

(PD Diary)

However, served as first bases of debate among young scientists (○)

Fraud of cell numbers

Disclose fraud report

(Cond. for rupture)

Rupture

Assessment of Damage

Proof of Violation

Debate